Supply Chain Risk Scorecard
Rate each of the 12 risk dimensions from 1 (Low) to 5 (Critical). The tool calculates your overall risk score and flags priority areas.
| Risk Dimension | Rating (1=Low, 5=Critical) |
|---|---|
| Supplier Concentration Dependence on single or few suppliers | |
| Supplier Financial Stability Risk of key supplier failure | |
| Lead Time Variability Unpredictability of delivery times | |
| Demand Volatility Unpredictability of customer demand | |
| Logistics Disruption Port, road, or carrier disruptions | |
| FX / Import Cost Exposure PKR devaluation impact on imports | |
| Inventory Accuracy Risk Risk from poor stock record quality | |
| Quality & Returns Risk Supplier quality failures and returns | |
| Regulatory / Customs Risk Import restrictions, duty changes | |
| Warehouse / Storage Risk Fire, theft, damage, capacity issues | |
| IT System Dependency Risk from ERP failure or data loss | |
| Key Person Dependency Reliance on specific individuals |
Supply Chain Risk in Pakistan
Pakistani SMEs face a unique combination of risks including PKR volatility affecting import costs, infrastructure constraints, extended port lead times at Karachi, and high dependence on a small number of key suppliers. A structured risk assessment is the first step to building resilience.
Worked Example
A distributor scores all 12 risk dimensions and arrives at a risk score of 68 out of 120, with supplier concentration and single-port dependency emerging as the two highest-scoring dimensions, both flagged for a formal mitigation plan with a named owner and a 90-day deadline.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Scoring risks once a year and treating the exercise as a compliance formality rather than a living document
- Rating impact without also rating likelihood, which misses risks that are low-probability but potentially catastrophic
- Assigning risk ownership to a department rather than a named individual, so mitigation actions never get actioned
- Focusing only on supply-side risks while ignoring demand-side and financial risks that are part of the same framework